Commercial product; contact vendor for plans and trials.
First released
Not verified
Last verified
Answer
BrowserUp is a load testing platform designed to shift testing earlier in the software development lifecycle by allowing teams to run load tests using their existing application code, test scripts, and page object models. It supports real-browser testing (via tools like Playwright and Selenium), API-level testing, and HTTP-level testing, providing detailed reporting and the ability.
About
BrowserUp is a load testing platform designed to shift testing earlier in the software development lifecycle by allowing teams to run load tests using their existing application code, test scripts, and page object models. It supports real-browser testing (via tools like Playwright and Selenium), API-level testing, and HTTP-level testing, providing detailed reporting and the ability to run distributed tests in a user's own AWS account or local Docker environment.
Best for
Browser/RUM scenarios across typical web and service stacks
Organizations budgeting for commercial licenses or subscriptions
Groups comfortable scripting in Java, JavaScript
Not the best fit when
Projects that require a fully free open-source stack only
Architecture and concurrency
BrowserUp is commonly operated as hybrid software with scenario authoring in Java, JavaScript. Concurrency and distribution depend on how you size workers or injectors.
Features
Code-based load testing in various languages (Java, JavaScript/Node, Python, Ruby, C#/.NET)
Support for real-browser testing (Playwright, Selenium, Capybara) and API/HTTP-level testing
Distributed load generation in AWS or local Docker containers
Automatic collection of Browser Core Web Vitals (LCP, FID, INP) for real-browser tests
Command-line interface (CLI) for test configuration and cluster management
Web UI for test monitoring, reporting (Summary, Connection, Hits, URLs, Websockets), and report studio for custom reports
Role-based access control and workspace management
Pricing
BrowserUp offers a freemium model (50 simultaneous users). Paid subscription tiers include: Team ($199/mo, 100 concurrent users), Pro ($499/mo, 1000 users), and Premium ($1499/mo, 3000 users). Enterprise plans are available via custom quote.
BrowserUp is best for teams validating real-browser or end-user experience under load. It is commercial software, typically licensed for larger or governed programs. Vendor: BrowserUp. Deployment model: hybrid. Commercial product; contact vendor for plans and trials. Confirm details against the official site and a short proof-of-concept in your environment.
How does BrowserUp differ from HelpMeTest?
Compared with HelpMeTest, deployment is hybrid versus cloud for HelpMeTest; scripting centers on Java, JavaScript rather than Robot Framework. BrowserUp lists protocols HTTP, HTTPS; HelpMeTest lists HTTP, HTTPS. Status is active versus active. Use the Test Rig to compare full specs side by side before a proof-of-concept.
What scripting language and concurrency model does BrowserUp use?
BrowserUp uses Java, JavaScript for scripting or scenario definition. Runtime model: code-first scenarios where virtual users execute scripted behavior under load. OS support: Windows, macOS, Linux, Browser. Protocols: HTTP, HTTPS. Match these to how your team already authors tests and which systems you must drive under load.
What is the cloud or enterprise path for BrowserUp?
BrowserUp supports a hybrid path that can combine self-hosted controllers or agents with cloud or distributed load as the product allows. Teams often keep sensitive assets private while bursting generators into the cloud. Pricing model: Commercial product; contact vendor for plans and trials.
What are known limitations of BrowserUp?
BrowserUp limitations to weigh: commercial licensing and quotes can gate large-scale or enterprise use. Status: active. Always validate against your target protocols and scale with a proof-of-concept. Confirm details against the official site and a short proof-of-concept in your environment.